KYIVS’KI FRESKY / KIEVSKIE FRESKI

Sergej Paradžanov

Scen.: Sergej Paradžanov, Pavlo Zahrebelnyi. F.: Oleksandr Antypenko. M.: Marfa Ponomarenko. Scgf.: Aleksandr Kudrja. Int.: Tengiz Arčvadze (artista), Vija Artmane (vedova), Afanasij Kočetkov (lo scaricatore di porto), Antonina Leftij (ex moglie dell’artista). Prod.: Studio cinematografico Dovženko. DCP. D.: 15’. Col.

info_outline
T. it.: Italian title. T. int.: International title. T. alt.: Alternative title. Sog.: Story. Scen.: Screenplay. F.: Cinematography. M.: Editing. Scgf.: Set Design. Mus.: Music. Int.: Cast. Prod.: Production Company. L.: Length. D.: Running Time. f/s: Frames per second. Bn.: Black e White. Col.: Color. Da: Print source

Film Notes

Parajanov worked on Kyivs’ki freski throughout 1965. While it never made it into production, he did write the scenario and shooting script, and filmed a handful of camera tests in October of that year. Ostensibly a celebration of the Great Patriotic War, Kyivs’ki freski is set on 9 May 1965 – the anniversary of Kyiv’s liberation. Parajanov’s script described the film as made up of ten “cine-frescoes”. It was to be both mainstream and innovative. Kyivs’ki freski offers a glimpse of both the poetics and imagery of The Colour of Pomegranates (1969). With its ornate gold frames, falling mother of pearl and shots of lace on glass, the overall graphic organisation of shots repeatedly draws attention to the artifice of cinema – Parajanov’s script even stipulates that our hero lives on a soundstage. Many of the frescoes concern a shared dream, linked with the image of a fluttering curtain – another image that will reappear in Pomegranates. For Parajanov, Kyivs’ki freski marked a departure from naturalistic acting in favour of purely expressive movement. This recalls not just Eisenstein’s fascination with gesture but also Parajanov’s early studies in violin, voice and ballet. Inevitably, the Kyiv office of the Russian State Film Agency, Goskino, Ukraine noted that the tests exhibited “a distorted… pathological perception of reality” and while acknowledging the value of Parajanov’s experimentation they nevertheless deemed the tests as having little relation to the scenario submitted. Consequently, the film was cancelled. Cinematographer Oleksandr Antypenko subsequently repurposed the tests into a short film. Shortly afterwards, Parajanov received a request from Hayfilm Studio in Armenia to make a film about the life of their national poet, Sayat Nova.

Daniel Bird

Copy From

Restored by Fixafilm and NCCA (National Cinema Centre of Armenia), produced within the Hamo Bek-Nazarov Project. Restoration supervised by Lukasz Ceranka and produced by Daniel Bird. Fundings provided by Kino Klassika Foundation